blog assignment 6

“Radical But Right” asserts animal should have to their right for protect human’s harm. To suppose the statement, the writer explained the benefits which from stop killing animal for food. According to the writer, by stop eating meat, the risk of having cancer, heart disease, diabetes, hypertension, high cholesterol and so on are decreased. Additionally, it is good for Earth because eating vegetable sustain the balance between maximizing people’s potential nutrition and minimizing the obstacle of maintaining the earth itself. The writer said less the amount of protein for animal and supplies to poor can release the worldwide starvation problem. To support the idea, the writer uses Deterlind,D’s text to show the fact. The article which Deterling wrote is about the amount of food for cow. The title of article is “Cows don’t need daily supplement” and explained by using scientific specific numbers. Deterling compared the amount of food which the cow required and which actual supplied and consists to give food twice a week. The writer of “Radical But Right “ cited the Deterling’s article to show how much amount of protein is feeding on cattle. The quotation what writer wrote said twenty one pounds of protein is fed to make one pound of meat protein. From this quotation, we can see the big loss of protein during making the meat and understand that we can save much protein by cut short the meat eating. As a result, by using the citation, the writer suggested the fact to give reliance of the information and shows the comparison by number that we can easily understand the seriousness.